In a Select Group of Patients Meeting Strict Clinical Criteria and Undergoing Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis, the Omission of a Diverting Ileostomy Offers Cost Savings to the Hospital | oneFAPvoice

welcome to oneFAPvoice

- a positively charged Familial Adenomatous Polyposis community.
  • join today!
scientific articles

In a Select Group of Patients Meeting Strict Clinical Criteria and Undergoing Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis, the Omission of a Diverting Ileostomy Offers Cost Savings to the Hospital

key information

source: Diseases of the colon and rectum

year: 2010

authors: Joyce M R, Kiran R P, Remzi F H, Church J, Fazio V W

summary/abstract:

PURPOSE : Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the standard care for the majority of patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis requiring surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether the omission of an ileostomy in patients undergoing ileal pouch surgery offers cost savings to the hospital.

METHODS : Patients who underwent open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between 2000 and 2007 were identified. They were grouped according to the absence or presence of an ileostomy at the time of their surgery. Direct costs were calculated from the hospital’s accounting database. Costs analyzed included those from the index surgery, ileostomy closure, and 6-month complications.

RESULTS : Cost data were available for 835 patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Seven hundred fifteen (86%) had a diverting ileostomy, and the ileostomy was omitted in 120 (14%). Patients without an ileostomy had a longer length of stay (8.7 vs 6.0 days; P < .001) and a 15% greater cost (P < .001) at the time of index surgery than did those with an ileostomy. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in costs related to complications. The total costs, including ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, ileostomy closure, and complications, were 25% greater in the ileostomy group than in the group who had the ileostomy omitted at the index surgery ($9176 (+/- 6559) vs $11,451 (+/- 8791); P < .001).

CONCLUSION : The above data shows that in a select group of patients meeting well-defined clinical criteria, the omission of a diverting ileostomy will provide significant cost savings for the hospital.

organization: Cleveland Clinic

DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d5e0fd

read more full text source

expertly curated content related to this topic

To improve your experience on this site, we use cookies. This includes cookies essential for the basic functioning of our website, cookies for analytics purposes, and cookies enabling us to personalize site content. By clicking on 'Accept' or any content on this site, you agree that cookies can be placed. You may adjust your browser's cookie settings to suit your preferences.
More information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close